3.9 Article

Trend analysis of monthly streamflows using Sen's innovative trend method

期刊

GEOFIZIKA
卷 35, 期 1, 页码 53-68

出版社

UNIV ZAGREB , ANDRIJA MOHOROVICIC GEOPHYS INST
DOI: 10.15233/gfz.2018.35.3

关键词

monthly mean streamflows; trend analysis; Mann-Kendall; Sen's method; innovative trend method

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Trend analysis of monthly mean streamflows is essential for better water resources management and planning. In this study, Mann Kendall (MK), Sen's method and Sen's innovative trend method (ITM) were employed in order to examine the possible trends of monthly streamflows obtained from nine stations from three basins (Yakabasi and Derecikviran in Western Black Sea Basin; Durucasu, Si:alike, Kale and Gomeleonu in Yesilirmak Basin; Simsirli, Tozkoy and Topluca in Eastern Black Sea Basin) located in Black Sea Region of Turkey. Based on the MK, streamflow data of Tozkoy Station which is located in western part of the Eastern Black Sea Region showed a significantly increasing trend while a significantly decreasing trend was found for the Yakabasi, Derecikviran, Durucasu and Sutluce stations which are situated in western part of the Black Sea Region. According to the Sen's trend method, a significantly decreasing trend was seen in Diummisu, Sutluce, Yakabasi and Derecikviran stations while Tozkoy station showed significantly increasing trend. According to the ITM, low-medium values of Tozkoy Station indicated slightly increasing trend while low and medium streamflow values of Yakabasi, Derecikviran, Durucasu and Sutluce stations showed a decreasing trend. High streamflow values of Derecikviran and Sutluce stations showed a decreasing trend while corresponding values of Yakabasi, Simsirli and Tozkoy stations indicated an increasing trend. It was showed that trends of low, medium, and high data can be easily identified by ITM which has some advantages (having no assumption such as serial relationship, non-normality, and, test number) over the Sen's method and Mann-Kendall test.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据