4.7 Article

X-ray microtomography analysis of lime application effects on soil porous system

期刊

GEODERMA
卷 324, 期 -, 页码 119-130

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.03.015

关键词

Soil porous system; 3D image analysis; Microtomography; Soil structure; Soil quality

资金

  1. CNPq
  2. CAPES [303726/2015-6, 88881.119578/2016-01, 88881.132800/2016-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Soil liming has demonstrated to be efficient to make acidic soils suitable to agriculture but little research has been done to evaluate its effect on soil structure in the microscale. X-ray microtomography (mu CT) is a useful technique to obtain valuable information about the micromorphological characteristics of soil and, thus, can provide important insight into how liming affects such a porous system. In this study, mu CT was used to evaluate changes on micromorphological and geometrical properties (porosity, number of pores, pore length, elongation, shape, connectivity and tortuosity) of a soil cultivated under no-tillage system (NTS) caused by the application of lime on the surface. A degraded pasture area representing soil conditions before the NTS implementation was also analyzed. Samples from two soil layers (0-10 cm, A, and 10-20 cm, B) were analyzed with a voxel size of 60 mu m. Image visualization, processing and analysis were performed in the Avizo Fire software. Liming improved the soil chemical attributes only at layer A where it also produced positive effects on the soil porous system within a period of thirty months. We highlight the increase in soil porosity and number of pores into which the main soil pore was separated, as evidences of liming effects. At layer A, those pores were found to be more elongated and more connected for the limed site. However, changes in the pattern of the separated pores, with the formation of cylindrical pores in the horizontal orientation for the limed site, were observed at both soil layers, which can be attributed to stimulation of the soil fauna activity due to liming.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据