4.7 Article

Soil respiration and its temperature sensitivity (Q10): Rapid acquisition using mid-infrared spectroscopy

期刊

GEODERMA
卷 323, 期 -, 页码 31-40

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.02.031

关键词

Heterotrophic soil respiration; Environmental soil classes; PLSR; Random Forest

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [SFB/TR32]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Spatial patterns of soil respiration (SR) and its sensitivity to temperature (Q10) are one of the key uncertainties in climate change research but since their assessment is very time-consuming, large data sets can still not be provided. Here, we investigated the potential of mid-infrared spectroscopy (MIRS) to predict SR and Q10 values for 124 soil samples of diverse land use types taken from a 2868 km(2) catchment (Rur catchment, Germany/Belgium/Netherlands). Soil respiration at standardized temperature (25 degrees C) and soil moisture (45% of maximum water holding capacity, WHC) was successfully predicted by MIRS coupled with partial least square regression (PLSR, R-2 = 0.83). Also the Q10 value was predictable by MIRS-PLSR for a grassland submodel (R-2 = 0.75) and a cropland submodel (R-2 = 0.72) but not for forested sites (R-2 = 0.03). In order to provide soil respiration estimates for arbitrary conditions of temperature and soil moisture, more flexible models are required that can handle nonlinear and interacting relations. Therefore, we applied a Random Forest model, which includes the MIRS spectra, temperature, soil moisture, and land use as predictor variables. We could show that SR can be simultaneously predicted for any temperature (5-25 degrees C) and soil moisture level (30-75% of WHC), indicated by a high R-2 of 0.73. We conclude that the combination of MIRS with sophisticated statistical prediction tools allows for a novel, rapid acquisition of SR and Q10 values across landscapes and thus to fill an important data gap in the validation of large scale carbon modeling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据