3.8 Review

Review of consenting processes for ocean energy in selected European Union Member States

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MARINE ENERGY
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 41-59

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijome.2014.12.001

关键词

Consenting; EU Member States; Marine renewables; Wave energy; Environmental Impact Assessment; Streamlining

资金

  1. Intelligent Energy Europe [IEE/09/809/SI2.558291]
  2. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) [06/CP/E003]
  3. Marine Renewable Energy Ireland (MaREI)
  4. SFI Centre for Marine Renewable Energy Research [12/RC/2302]
  5. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) [06/CP/E003] Funding Source: Science Foundation Ireland (SFI)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Consenting is still generally regarded as a non-technological barrier to the progress of the marine renewable energy industry, caused by the complexity of consenting processes and the lack of dedicated legal frameworks. Existing consenting systems for ocean energy projects tend to be based on procedures designed for other sectors and are seen as inappropriate for the specific needs of ocean energy. Licensing procedures are also viewed by developers as time-consuming because regulators see ocean energy as a new activity with unknown or uncertain effects and consequently often apply strong interpretation of the precautionary principle. Consenting processes for ocean energy are, nevertheless, evolving throughout Europe, driven by national and European policies and incentives on renewables, changing legal and administrative frameworks to facilitate development and more integrated marine governance. This review compares the consenting processes for ocean energy in different European countries, focusing on aspects thought to hamper operation of the process. It shows that different systems of governance across the EU Member States have resulted in diversity in the design of consenting processes, though common features can also be identified. This evidence-based review enables suggestions for streamlining consenting processes for wave energy. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据