4.7 Article

Reliability of shell carbon isotope composition of different land snail species as a climate proxy: A case study in the monsoon region of China

期刊

GEOCHIMICA ET COSMOCHIMICA ACTA
卷 228, 期 -, 页码 42-61

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2018.02.022

关键词

Land snail shells; Carbon isotope composition; East Asian monsoon region; Climatic factors; Climate proxy

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFA0600503]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41373091, 41321062, 41230526]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Carbon isotope compositions of land snail shells (delta C-13(shell)) are shown to be indicative of local climate conditions. However, it is largely unknown how the responses of delta C-13(shell) to climatic factors changes amongst different species. In this study, we collected 3 species of land snail shells across the East Asian monsoon region of China to explore the overall relationship between delta C-13(shell) as well as the response of individual species to the regional climate. Results show that, whereas all species collectively can provide a consensus relation between delta C-13(shell) and local climatic factors such as temperature and precipitation; the response of individual species to the fluctuations of these factors is not uniform. Specifically, while the southerly species Bradybaena similaris exhibits robust delta C-13(shell)-mean precipitation correlation in both linearity and sensitivity, a common northerly species, Cathaica fasciola, only finds limited utility as a climate indicator, particularly for precipitation. Meanwhile, the south-central species Acusta ravida appears to be able to faithfully record past climate conditions despite showing a wider distribution and a broader habitat. Such species-dependent nature in the relations between delta C-13(shell) and local climatic factors can be attributed to the effect of ingested carbonate and variations in eco-physiological factors of different species, and is expected to be widespread, suggesting the need to be taken into consideration for future studies. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据