4.7 Article

The HUSH complex cooperates with TRIM28 to repress young retrotransposons and new genes

期刊

GENOME RESEARCH
卷 28, 期 6, 页码 836-845

出版社

COLD SPRING HARBOR LAB PRESS, PUBLICATIONS DEPT
DOI: 10.1101/gr.228171.117

关键词

-

资金

  1. Royal Society [101200/Z/13/Z]
  2. Wellcome Trust [101200/Z/13/Z]
  3. Wellcome Trust Principal Research Fellowship [101835/Z/13/Z]
  4. UCL
  5. Athena SWAN Infection and Immunity maternity fund award
  6. UCL Grand Challenges Studentship
  7. Wellcome Trust [101200/Z/13/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Retrotransposons encompass half of the human genome and contribute to the formation of heterochromatin, which provides nuclear structure and regulates gene expression. Here, we asked if the human silencing hub (HUSH) complex is necessary to silence retrotransposons and whether it collaborates with TRIM28 and the chromatin remodeler ATRX at specific genomic loci. We show that the HUSH complex contributes to de novo repression and DNA methylation of an SVA retrotransposon reporter. By using naive versus primed mouse pluripotent stem cells, we reveal a critical role for the HUSH complex in naive cells, implicating it in programming epigenetic marks in development. Although the HUSH component FAM208A binds to endogenous retroviruses (ERVs) and long interspersed element-1s (LINE-1s or L1s), it is mainly required to repress evolutionarily young L1s (mouse-specific lineages <5 million years old). TRIM28, in contrast, is necessary to repress both ERVs and young Us. Genes co-repressed by TRIM28 and FAM208A are evolutionarily young, or exhibit tissue-specific expression, are enriched in young L1s, and display evidence for regulation through LTR promoters. Finally, we demonstrate that the HUSH complex is also required to repress L1 elements in human cells. Overall, these data indicate that the HUSH complex and TRIM28 co-repress young retrotransposons and new genes rewired by retrotransposon noncoding DNA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据