4.7 Article

Inherited DNA methylation primes the establishment of accessible chromatin during genome activation

期刊

GENOME RESEARCH
卷 28, 期 7, 页码 998-1007

出版社

COLD SPRING HARBOR LAB PRESS, PUBLICATIONS DEPT
DOI: 10.1101/gr.228833.117

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFA0102600, 2016YFA 0100400]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [313 22031, 31571365, 31371288, 31601161]
  3. Program of Shanghai Academic Research Leader [17XD1403600]
  4. Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Commission [17ZR1449500]
  5. National Program for Support of Top-notch Young Professionals

向作者/读者索取更多资源

For animals, epigenetic modifications can be globally or partially inherited from gametes after fertilization, and such information is required for proper transcriptional regulation, especially during the process of zygotic genome activation (ZGA). However, the mechanism underlying how the inherited epigenetic signatures affect transcriptional regulation during ZGA remains poorly understood. Here, we performed genome-wide profiling of chromatin accessibility during zebrafish ZGA, which is closely related to zygotic transcriptional regulation. We observed a clear trend toward a gradual increase in accessible chromatin during ZGA. Furthermore, accessible chromatin at the promoters displayed a sequential priority of emergence, and the locations of the accessible chromatin were precisely primed by the enrichment of unmethylated CpGs that were fully inherited from gametes. On the other hand, distal regions with high methylation levels that were inherited from the sperm facilitated the binding of DNA methylation-preferred transcription factors, such as Pou5f3 and Nanog, which contributed to the establishment of accessible chromatin at these loci. Our results demonstrate a model whereby inherited DNA methylation signatures from gametes prime the establishment of accessible chromatin during zebrafish ZGA through two distinct mechanisms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据