4.6 Article

Clinical history and management recommendations of the smooth muscle dysfunction syndrome due to ACTA2 arginine 179 alterations

期刊

GENETICS IN MEDICINE
卷 20, 期 10, 页码 1206-1215

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/gim.2017.245

关键词

ACTA2; congenital mydriasis; patent ductus arteriosus smooth muscle dysfunction syndrome; thoracic aortic aneurysm

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 HL109942]
  2. John Ritter Foundation
  3. Temerty Family Foundation
  4. Genetic Aortic Disorders Association

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Smooth muscle dysfunction syndrome (SMDS) due to heterozygous ACTA2 arginine 179 alterations is characterized by patent ductus arteriosus, vasculopathy (aneurysm and occlusive lesions), pulmonary arterial hypertension, and other complications in smooth muscle-dependent organs. We sought to define the clinical history of SMDS to develop recommendations for evaluation and management. Methods: Medical records of 33 patients with SMDS (median age 12 years) were abstracted and analyzed. Results: All patients had congenital mydriasis and related pupillary abnormalities at birth and presented in infancy with a patent ductus arteriosus or aortopulmonary window. Patients had cerebrovascular disease characterized by small vessel disease (hyperintense periventricular white matter lesions; 95%), intracranial artery stenosis (77%), ischemic strokes (27%), and seizures (18%). Twelve (36%) patients had thoracic aortic aneurysm repair or dissection at median age of 14 years and aortic disease was fully penetrant by the age of 25 years. Three (9%) patients had axillary artery aneurysms complicated by thromboembolic episodes. Nine patients died between the ages of 0.5 and 32 years due to aortic, pulmonary, or stroke complications, or unknown causes. Conclusion: Based on these data, recommendations are provided for the surveillance and management of SMDS to help prevent early-onset life-threatening complications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据