4.4 Article

Determinants of Base-Pair Substitution Patterns Revealed by Whole-Genome Sequencing of DNA Mismatch Repair Defective Escherichia coli

期刊

GENETICS
卷 209, 期 4, 页码 1029-1042

出版社

GENETICS SOCIETY AMERICA
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.118.301237

关键词

mismatch repair; mutation accumulation; mutation hotspots; DNA replication accuracy; DNA polymerase fidelity

资金

  1. United States (US) Army Research Office Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative (MURI) Award [W911NF-09-1-0444]
  2. National Institutes of Health award [T32 GM007757]
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [T32GM007757] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mismatch repair (MMR) is a major contributor to replication fidelity, but its impact varies with sequence context and the nature of the mismatch. Mutation accumulation experiments followed by whole-genome sequencing of MMR-defective Escherichia coli strains yielded approximate to 30,000base-pair substitutions (BPSs), revealing mutational patterns across the entire chromosome. The BPS spectrum was dominated by A:T to G:C transitions, which occurred predominantly at the center base of 5NAC3+5GTN3 triplets. Surprisingly, growth on minimal medium or at low temperature attenuated these mutations. Mononucleotide runs were also hotspots for BPSs, and the rate at which these occurred increased with run length. Comparison with approximate to 2000BPSs accumulated in MMR-proficient strains revealed that both kinds of hotspots appeared in the wild-type spectrum and so are likely to be sites of frequent replication errors. In MMR-defective strains transitions were strand biased, occurring twice as often when A and C rather than T and G were on the lagging-strand template. Loss of nucleotide diphosphate kinase increases the cellular concentration of dCTP, which resulted in increased rates of mutations due to misinsertion of C opposite A and T. In an mmr ndk double mutant strain, these mutations were more frequent when the template A and T were on the leading strand, suggesting that lagging-strand synthesis was more error-prone, or less well corrected by proofreading, than was leading strand synthesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据