4.6 Article

Ortholog-based screening and identification of genes related to intracellular survival

期刊

GENE
卷 651, 期 -, 页码 134-142

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2018.01.059

关键词

Orthologs; Intracellular survival; Comparative genomics; uvrY; usg

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31372446]
  2. Research of Key Technology for Prevention of Major Zoonosis in Dairy Cattle [2015NZ0104]
  3. National Special Foundation for Science & Technology Basic Research [2012FY111000]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bioinformatics and comparative genomics analysis methods were used to predict unknown pathogen genes based on homology with identified or functionally clustered genes. In this study, the genes of common pathogens were analyzed to screen and identify genes associated with intracellular survival through sequence similarity, phylogenetic tree analysis and the lambda-Red recombination system test method. The total 38,952 protein-coding genes of common pathogens were divided into 19,775 clusters. As demonstrated through a COG analysis, information storage and processing genes might play an important role intracellular survival. Only 19 clusters were present in facultative intracellular pathogens, and not all were present in extracellular pathogens. Construction of a phylogenetic tree selected 18 of these 19 clusters. Comparisons with the DEG database and previous research revealed that seven other clusters are considered essential gene clusters and that seven other clusters are associated with intracellular survival. Moreover, this study confirmed that clusters screened by orthologs with similar function could be replaced with an approved uvrY gene and its orthologs, and the results revealed that the usg gene is associated with intracellular survival. The study improves the current understanding of intracellular pathogens characteristics and allows further exploration of the intracellular survival-related gene modules in these pathogens.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据