4.8 Article

Acute Pancreatitis and Pancreatic Cancer Risk: A Nationwide Matched-Cohort Study in Denmark

期刊

GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 154, 期 6, 页码 1729-1736

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.02.011

关键词

Pancreas; Etiology; Epidemiology; Risk Factor

资金

  1. The Danish Cancer Society [R124-A7521] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Acute pancreatitis may be a risk factor for pancreatic cancer; however, findings from studies on this association are conflicting. We investigated the association between acute pancreatitis and increased risk of pancreatic cancer. METHODS: We conducted a nationwide, population-based, matched cohort study of all patients admitted to a hospital in Denmark with a diagnosis of acute pancreatitis from January 1, 1980, through October 31, 2012. As many as 5 individuals from the general population without acute pancreatitis were matched for age and sex to each patient with acute pancreatitis. Pancreatic cancer risk was expressed as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), calculated using the Cox proportional hazards model. Cox models were stratified by age, sex, and year of pancreatitis diagnosis and adjusted for alcohol- and smoking-related conditions, and Charlson Comorbidity Index score. RESULTS: We included 41,669 patients diagnosed with incident acute pancreatitis and 208,340 comparison individuals. Patients with acute pancreatitis had an increased risk of pancreatic cancer compared with the age- and sex-matched general population throughout the follow-up period. The risk decreased over time but remained high after more than 5 years of follow-up (adjusted HR 2.02; 95% CI 1.57-2.61). Two- and 5-year absolute risks of pancreatic cancer among patients with acute pancreatitis were 0.70% (95% CI 0.62%-0.78%) and 0.87% (95% CI 0.78%-0.97), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In a nationwide, population-based, matched cohort study, we observed an association between a diagnosis of acute pancreatitis and long-term risk of pancreatic cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据