4.7 Article

Mental health effects of perceived living environment and neighborhood safety in urbanizing China

期刊

HABITAT INTERNATIONAL
卷 46, 期 -, 页码 101-110

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.11.002

关键词

China; Migration; Urbanization; Living environment; Neighborhood safety; Mental health

资金

  1. Research Grants Council of Hong Kong [PolyU5416/10H]
  2. Chiang Ching-Kuo Foundation for International Scholarly Exchange [RG022-P-09]
  3. Li & Fung China Social Policy Research Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the past three decades, the rapid migration and urbanization process in China has led to significant changes in urban neighborhood composition and characteristics, which have serious implications for individuals' mental health status. Using data from a 2011 national survey of urban China, we examine the associations of perceived living environment and neighborhood safety with CES-D depressive distress among urban residents, rural-to-urban migrants, and, for the first time, urbanized rural residents who have experienced in-situ urbanization. Contrary to our hypotheses, rural-to-urban migrants and in-situ urbanized rural residents do not perceive their living environment and neighborhood safety more negatively than urban residents after controlling for individual and household characteristics, county-level and prefectural socio-economic and safety measures, and provincial fixed effects. Moreover, the associations of perceived living environment and neighborhood safety with mental health are the most prominent among urban residents; no significant mental health effects are found for either rural-to-urban migrants or urbanized rural residents. As the urbanization of the countryside is outstripping the urbanization of people, the potential risks of this unprecedented urbanization of the world's most populous nation on mental health require further practice and policy attention. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据