4.3 Article

Taxonomic implications of geographical variation in Rhinolophus affinis (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae) in mainland Southeast Asia

期刊

ZOOLOGICAL STUDIES
卷 54, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH CENTER, ACAD SINICA
DOI: 10.1186/s40555-015-0109-8

关键词

Rhinolophus affinis; Subspecies; Morphology; Echolocation; Genetics; Indochinese subregion; Sundaic subregion

类别

资金

  1. Ministry of Higher Education in Malaysia through Research Acculturation Collaborative Effort grant [RACE/G (2)/1107/2013]
  2. NSRL at Museum of Texas Tech University
  3. Research Center for Biology, Indonesian Institute of Sciences
  4. Natural History Museum, London
  5. Vietnam National Foundation for Science and Technology Development (NAFOSTED) [106.11-2012.02]
  6. Graduate School of PSU
  7. Center for Biodiversity Conservation, Fauna & Flora International Cambodia program
  8. Royal University of Phnom Penh
  9. UK Darwin Initiative [18002, EIDPO028]
  10. CEPF (Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund)
  11. John D and Catherine D MacArthur Foundation [09-92411-000-GSS]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Rhinolophus affinis sensu lato is distributed throughout Southeast Asia. The taxonomic status of forms attributed to the species is unclear due to the limited sample size with incomplete datasets and the taxa have high variation in morphology and echolocation call frequency. The aim of the study was to evaluate the distribution and taxonomic status of the subspecific forms of R. affinis in mainland Southeast Asia using large sample size with multiple datasets, including morphological, acoustic, and genetic data, both to elucidate taxonomic relationships and to test for congruence between these datasets. Results: Three morphological forms were confirmed within the region; two concur with previously recognized taxa, namely R. affinis macrurus and R. affinis superans, and are strongly supported by morphological and genetic data. The third form is morphologically distinct, but its taxonomic status remains unclear. It is probable that this third form represents a distinct taxonomic entity; however, more data are required to confirm this. R. a. macrurus is known from the north of peninsular Thailand, Cambodia, Myanmar, Laos, and Vietnam (Indochinese subregion); R. a. superans is found throughout the Thai- Malay Peninsula (Sundaic subregion); whilst the third form is presently known from east central Myanmar (Shan state) and lower northern Vietnam (Nghe An Province). Conclusions: Our results suggest that at least three morphological forms occur in mainland Southeast Asia including one form which appears to be new to science. Echolocation call data for R. affinis are not a robust taxonomic tool as it shows a significant degree of variation which is not explained or supported by genetic and morphological findings. This study highlights significant levels of morphological variation in mainland Southeast Asia and provides an essential basis for further studies aiming to understand the population genetics, phylogeography, and taxonomy of the species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据