期刊
INTERNET AND HIGHER EDUCATION
卷 25, 期 -, 页码 37-44出版社
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.12.002
关键词
Wild; Script; Collaboration; Collaborative learning
资金
- Academy of Finland [258659]
- Ghent University [BOF11/STA/026]
- Academy of Finland (AKA) [258659, 258659] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)
This study investigates the effect of a collaboration script - i.e. a set of instructions to improve collaboration between learning partners - for a wild task. Participants were first-year university students in Educational Sciences (N = 186) collaborating in groups of five during a three-week period to create a wild on peer assessment in education. Two conditions were contrasted: a scripted and a non-scripted condition. The effect of scripting was measured in four ways (questionnaires, log-file analyses, group product scores, and individual pre-post-test scores). Results show significant positive effects of scripting with respect to the collaborative group processes and students' feelings of shared responsibility. No significant effects of scripting were found with respect to the developed wild products. As for students' individual learning outcomes, results showed a significant increase from pre- to post-test for all students. Although the increase was higher in the scripted condition, the difference between the conditions was not statistically significant. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据