4.7 Article

Multi-criteria based zone head selection in Internet of Things based wireless sensor networks

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2018.04.091

关键词

Wireless sensor network; Energy efficiency; Network stability; Zone/cluster head selection; Internet of Things

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The past few years have seen dramatic development and a great interest in efficient service delivery and better resource utilization in the Internet of Things (IoT) based constrained Wireless Sensor Network (WSN). The IoT is mainly dependent on optimal deployment of energy aware WSN and efficient communication architecture for data transfer among heterogeneous devices. In addition, energy efficient clustering techniques for WSN node deployment and routing have achieved great involvement for prolonging network lifetime. In clustering technique, where the network is partitioned into different segments (clusters or zones) and proper attention must be given to the cluster head (CH) selection procedure for maximizing node reachability inside the cluster and efficient communication to the base station. In this paper, we have proposed multi-criteria based cluster head/zone head selection scheme in Internet of Things based WSN by considering distinct parameters affecting node energy and network lifetime. These parameters; energy level, distance from neighboring nodes, distance from center of the zone, number of times a node has been zone head and whether a node is merged or not, have direct impact on overall performance of WSN. The relative impact of each parameter in CH/ZH selection is computed using the Analytical Network Process (ANP) which is widely used multi-criteria decision tool. Simulation results of the proposed scheme show relatively better performance than existing energy efficient clustering techniques. The obtained results have been analyzed by varying the number of parameters in ZH selection and their impact on network stability and lifetime. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据