4.5 Article

Does Apolipoprotein E Genotype Increase Risk of Postoperative Delirium?

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY
卷 23, 期 10, 页码 1029-1037

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jagp.2014.12.192

关键词

Apolipoprotein E; delirium; dementia

资金

  1. National Institute on Aging [T32AG023480, P01AG031720, K07AG041835, R01AG030618, K24AG035075]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To determine whether apolipoprotein E (ApoE) is associated with postoperative delirium incidence, severity, and duration in older patients free of dementia at baseline. Methods: The authors examined 557 nondemented patients aged 70 years or older undergoing major noncardiac surgery enrolled in the Successful Aging after Elective Surgery Study. Three ApoE measures were considered: epsilon 2, epsilon 4 carriers versus noncarriers, and a three-category ApoE measure. Delirium was determined using the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) and chart review. We used generalized linear models to estimate the association between ApoE and delirium incidence, severity (peak CAM Severity [CAM-S] score), and days. Results: ApoE e2 and e4 was present in 15% and 19%, respectively, and postoperative delirium occurred in 24%. Among patients with delirium, the mean peak CAM-S score was 8.0 (standard deviation: 4), with most patients experiencing 1 or 2 delirium days (51% or 28%, respectively). After adjusting for age, sex, surgical procedure, and preoperative cognitive function, ApoE e4 and e2 carrier status were not associated with postoperative delirium: RR for epsilon 4 = 1.0, 95% CI: 0.7-1.5 and RR for epsilon 2 = 0.9, 95% CI: 0.6-1.4. No association between ApoE and delirium severity or number of delirium days was observed. Conclusion: In older surgery patients free of dementia, our findings do not support the hypothesis that the ApoE genotype does not confer either risk or protection in postoperative delirium incidence, severity, or duration. Thus, an important genetic risk factor for Alzheimer disease does not affect risk of delirium.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据