4.7 Article

Influence of pressure on fluidized bed gasifier: Specific coal throughput and particle behavior

期刊

FUEL
卷 220, 期 -, 页码 80-88

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.02.005

关键词

Fluidized bed; Pressure; Gasification; Co-gasification; Particle velocity

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21506242]
  2. Foundation of State Key Laboratory of High-efficiency Utilization of Coal and Green Chemical Engineering [2017-K02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, the influence of pressure on specific coal throughput and particle behavior was investigated. Firstly, mono-gasification of Jincheng anthracite (JCA) and meat and bone meal (MBM) and co-gasification of JCA and MBM were performed in pressurized fluidized bed gasifier pilot plant with a pressure of 0.1-2.6 MPa and a temperature of 900-1050 degrees C (mono-gasification of MBM at about 750 degrees C). It was found that the specific coal throughput is approximately directly proportional to the pressure to the power of 0.6-0.75 and co-gasification leads to successful thermochemical conversion of JCA as opposed to mono-gasification. Furthermore, a series of experiments, in a Pseudo-2D cold mode of a pressurized fluidized bed gasifier using an optic fiber probe system, have been performed to investigate the effects of pressure, fluidizing-gas velocity and static bed height on the particle behavior. The bed material used in this study was polystyrene having average diameter of 1.32 mm. It was found that the effect of pressure on vertical local-particle velocities (V-p) at low bed height (LBH) can be ignored at identical excess fluidizing-gas velocity while V-p at high bed height (HBH) decrease slightly with pressure in the lower pressure range (evidently below approximately 1.2 MPa) and increase thereafter. The effects of the fluidizing-gas velocity on V-p at LBH and HBH are also different. However, the effects of static bed height on V-p both at LBH and HBH are the same under pressure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据