4.7 Article

Comparing the effects of CH4, CO2, and N2 injection on asphaltene precipitation and deposition at reservoir condition: A visual and modeling study

期刊

FUEL
卷 217, 期 -, 页码 633-641

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.01.005

关键词

Asphaltene precipitation; Enhanced oil recovery; Carbon dioxide injection; Nitrogen injection; Methane injection

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Oil Recovery (EOR) through various methodologies has been an active research for many years seeking efficient methods to increase the crude oil recovery efficiency from oil reservoirs. Among different gas injection scenarios, carbon dioxide (CO2), natural gas (mainly methane (CH4)) and nitrogen (N-2) injection are considered as promising EOR agents. Asphaltene precipitation and deposition during EOR methods cause severe problems, which affect the recovery efficiency and increase the cost of the incremental oil production. This study is aimed to investigate the effects of CH4 and N-2 injection compared with CO2 injection on asphaltene precipitation and deposition. The different mole percent of the mentioned gases were introduced into the high-pressure cell, then the amount of precipitated asphaltene was measured at the reservoir condition. The evolution of asphaltene deposition was monitored through a high-resolution microscope. Moreover, Image processing software was utilized to check the amount of deposited asphaltene and its size distribution under different conditions. The most apparent finding to emerge from this study is that both CO2 and natural gas increase the amount of precipitated asphaltene whereas the nitrogen as an inert gas has no considerable effect on the amount of precipitated asphaltene. According to the results, the increment of precipitated asphaltene by CO2 is much higher than natural gas. Further, the thermodynamic solid model used in this study reasonably predicted the trend of asphaltene precipitation process for the mentioned EOR scenarios.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据