4.7 Article

A new predictive thermodynamic framework for phase behavior of gas hydrate

期刊

FUEL
卷 216, 期 -, 页码 796-809

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.11.128

关键词

Gas hydrate; Predictive model; Modified Huron-Vidal mixing rule; UNIQUAC; Phase equilibrium

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a thermodynamic framework for predicting hydrate equilibrium pressure of gas species including methane, ethane, propane, nitrogen, carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulfide and their mixtures. For this purpose, Peng-Robinson-Stryjek-Vera equation of state (PRSV-EOS) along with modified Huron-Vidal (MHV1) mixing rule and UNIQUAC model were employed to calculate fugacity and activity coefficient of water in equilibrated fluid phases. To represent phase behavior of solid hydrate, a modified version of van der Waals and Platteeuw (vWd-P) model was utilized which accounts for guest interaction with water molecules beyond first shell of cavity and also asymmetry of encapsulated molecules and cage structure. In addition, dissolution of gas compounds in aqueous phase and subsequent non-ideality of water was taken into account. It was realized that both physical phenomena are of marked influence on the prediction accuracy. In contrast to conventional modelling approaches which scarify some part of equilibrium data to regress some adjustable parameters, advantageously, our model does not require any pre-matching. It was observed that present framework gives accurate prediction for equilibrium pressure of hydrates of CH4, C2H6, C3H8, CO2, N-2 and H2S with overall average absolute percent deviation (AAPD) 3.2, 3.4, 3.7, 1.5, 2.8 and 1.3, respectively. Also, incipient pressure of hydrate formed by binary gas mixtures comprised of aforementioned single components could accurately be predicted by proposed approach, which is detailed in the manuscript. Overall, formation pressures predicted by proposed modelling approach are more accurate (or at least comparable) to outstanding models presented in the hydrate literature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据