4.7 Article

Study on the Hg emission and migration characteristics in coal-fired power plant of China with an ammonia desulfurization process

期刊

FUEL
卷 211, 期 -, 页码 621-628

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.09.083

关键词

Mercury emission and migration; Ammonia-based wet flue gas desulfurization; Air pollution control devices; Mercury re-emission

资金

  1. National Key R & D Program of China [2016YFB0600203]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51576044]
  3. Environment and Protection Project of Jiangsu Province [2016030]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Migration and emission characteristics of mercury in coal-fired power plant with an ammonia-based wet flue gas desulfurization (Am-based WFGD) process were studied based on the Ontario Hydro Method (OHM). The temperature-programmed desorption (TPD) method was used to identify the mercury species enrichment mechanisms in fly ash and the by-products of desulfurization. The SCR has a 95.41% mercury oxidation efficiency attributed to the high chlorine content in feed coal. SCR + ESP+ WFGD combination has 94.15% gaseous mercury removal efficiency. Mercury distribution analysis showed that most of incoming mercury was deposited in solid (76.46%), and only 4.94% gaseous mercury was emitted to atmosphere. The TPD results indicate that HgCl2 and HgO are the dominant mercury species in fly ash while mercury in WFGD products exists in HgCl2 form. The re-emission of mercury during ammonia desulfurization did not occur due to the presence of forced oxidation process, while mercury release from desulfurization product was monitored suggesting the mercury reemission from the ammonium sulfate separate and drying system could not be ignored. The mercury emission factor of the coal-fired power plant is calculated as 0.319 g/10(12) J, less than the mean value of Chinese power plant. With the equipment of Am-based WFGD, the mercury content in ammonium sulfate is 1.126 mg/kg, therefore the environmental influence from ammonium should be taken into account.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据