4.7 Article

Performance of synthetic CaO-based sorbent pellets for CO2 capture and kinetic analysis

期刊

FUEL
卷 232, 期 -, 页码 205-214

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.05.143

关键词

Sorbent; CaO; Inert support; Pellet; Kinetic model

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFB0600605]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1738104, 51776083, 51661125011]
  3. Analytical and Testing Center at Huazhong University of Science and Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Three powdery CaO-based sorbents were synthesized respectively from calcium acetate and three different inert support precursors. Based on these sorbent powder, sorbent pellets without and with pore forming material (cellulose) were fabricated using an extrusion-spheronization method. Cyclic CO2 sorption performance of all powdery sorbents and sorbent pellets were tested in a TGA. It was found that introduction of inert supports was beneficial for enhancing the CO2 capture capacity of CaO. For sorbent powder, sintering was retarded due to high thermal stability of inert supports and good dispersion of CaO particles among inert supports, resulting in better performance of synthetic sorbent than calcined CaCO3. However, CO2 uptake of sorbent pellets deteriorated dramatically owing to damage of pore structure caused in the extrusion process. Cn and Xn was even lower than 0.1 g CO2/g sorbent and 20% for sorbent pellets during the 25th cycle. Adding cellulose was found to be effective for promoting the CO2 sorption capacity of sorbents which was mainly ascribed to enlarged specific surface area and pore volume during cellulose burning. Two kinetic models were used to understand the mechanism of the carbonation reaction and the models were proven to be feasible for analyzing the chemical reaction controlled stage and diffusion controlled stage in the carbonation process. Reaction rate constants obtained from kinetic calculation can also be used to explain the different performance between different types of sorbents.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据