4.7 Article

Environmental mitigation of sludge combustion via two opposite modifying strategies: Kinetics and stabilization effect

期刊

FUEL
卷 227, 期 -, 页码 346-354

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.04.113

关键词

Sludge combustion; Kinetic mechanism; TG-MS; Polluting gas; Trace element

资金

  1. National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [51522401]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51472007, 51772141]
  3. Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Committee [ZDSYS201602261932201, JCYJ20170412154335393, KQTD2016022619584022]
  4. Southern University of Science and Technology [G01296001]
  5. Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Soil and Groundwater Pollution Control [2017B030301012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nowadays, environmental mitigation remains a key issue challenging sludge combustion toward its clean utilization. Herein, two opposite additives, CaO and kaolin, representing two different strategies, were employed for environmental mitigation of sludge combustion. An advanced TG-MS (thermogravimetric-mass spectrometer) system was used. The online MS analysis indicated that kaolin remarkably decreased the release of NOx whereas the fixation effect of CaO on SO2 was more pronounced. Furthermore, the experiments using a fixed tube furnace proved that overall kaolin had a better role controlling volatility of trace elements (Cr, Ni, Cu, Zn, Pb, As and Ba) than CaO and we found that the fixation mechanism of CaO changed at 750 degrees C, whereas that of kaolin changed at 500 degrees C. Then the kinetics of the various stages during sludge combustion were investigated. We found that low temperature stages were along with the formation of new phases, whereas, at high temperatures, the diffusion could be rate-controlling step. The present study thus provides not only a deep understanding of sludge combustion mechanisms but also two effective modifying strategies toward the environmental mitigation of sludge combustion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据