4.7 Article

Bark beetles as agents of change in social-ecological systems

期刊

FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT
卷 16, 期 -, 页码 S34-S43

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/fee.1754

关键词

-

资金

  1. Mountain Social Ecological Observatory Network [NSF DEB-1231233]
  2. Past Global Changes through the Forest Dynamics group
  3. Past Global Changes through EcoRes working group
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences [1145815] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Division Of Earth Sciences [1440015, 1204460] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Division Of Environmental Biology [1231233] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Due to recent outbreaks of native bark beetles, forest ecosystems have experienced substantial changes in landscape structure and function, which also affect nearby human populations. As a result, land managers have been tasked with sustaining ecosystem services in impacted areas by considering the best available science, public perceptions, and monitoring data to develop strategies to suppress bark beetle epidemics, and in some cases to restore affected lands and ecosystem services. The effects of bark beetle outbreaks are often detrimental to the provision of ecosystem services, including degraded landscape aesthetics and diminished air and water quality. However, there have been instances where bark beetle outbreaks have benefited communities by, for example, improving habitat for grazing animals and enhancing real-estate values. As a consequence of the interaction of a warming climate and susceptible forest stand conditions, the frequency, severity, and extent of bark beetle outbreaks are expected to increase and therefore will continue to challenge many social-ecological systems. We synthesize experiences from recent outbreaks to encourage knowledge transfer from previously impacted communities to potentially vulnerable locations that may be at risk from future bark beetle epidemics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据