4.5 Article

A theoretical study of water adsorption and dissociation on Ni(111) surface during oxidative steam reforming and water gas shift processes

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE ENERGY INSTITUTE
卷 88, 期 2, 页码 112-117

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.joei.2014.07.004

关键词

Nickel (Ni); Adsorption; Dissociation; Water (H2O); Density functional theory (DFT)

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21206074]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu province [BK2012406]
  3. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20123219120033]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [30920130111012, 30920140112004]
  5. Zijin Intelligent Program of Nanjing University of Science and Technology [2013-ZJ-0103]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Density functional theory (DFT) calculations were performed to investigate the adsorption of water (H2O) on Ni(111) surface and the corresponding dehydrogenation reaction during oxidative steam reforming. The equilibrium configuration on top, bridge and hollow (fcc and hcp) site was determined by relaxation of the system. The adsorption of H2O on top site is favorable on Ni(111) surface, while the adsorptions of OH, H and O on hollow (fcc) site is preferred. The adsorbates are adsorbed on the nickel surface due to the interaction between p orbital of adsorbates and d orbital of nickel atoms, and the interaction is manifest on the first layer than that on any others. The dehydrogenation reaction of H2O on clean and oxygen-covered nickel surface was also investigated. The results show that the dissociation energy of H atom is 72.95 kJ mol(-1) on clean nickel surface. While dissociation energy decreases to 69.86 kJ mol(-1) with the aid of pre-adsorbed O atom (O-ads). These phenomena indicate that the energy barrier of dehydrogenation on the pre-covered oxygen nickel surface is lower and Oads can promote the dehydrogenation of H2O. (C) 2014 Energy Institute. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据