4.7 Article

The analysis and delimitation of Central Business District using network kernel density estimation

期刊

JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY
卷 45, 期 -, 页码 32-47

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.04.008

关键词

Central Business District; Kernel density estimation; Point of Interest; Network analysis

资金

  1. Key Laboratory of Urban Land Resources Monitoring and Simulation, Ministry of Land and Resources
  2. National High-Tech Research and Development Plan of China [2012AA12A404]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Central Business District (CBD) is the core area of urban planning and decision management. The cartographic definition and representation of CBD is of great significance in studying the urban development and its functions. In order to facilitate these processes, the Kernel Density Estimation (KDE) is a very efficient tool as it considers the decay impact of services and allows the enrichment of the information from a very simple input scatter plot to a smooth output density surface. However, most existing methods of density analysis consider geographic events in a homogeneous and isotropic space under Euclidean space representation. Considering the case that the physical movement in the urban environment is usually constrained by a street network, we propose a different method for the delimitation of CBD with network configurations. First, starting from the locations of central activities, a concentration index is presented to visualize the functional urban environment by means of a density surface, which is refined with network distances rather than Euclidean ones. Then considering the specialties of network distance computation problem, an efficient way supported by flow extension simulation is proposed. Taking Shenzhen and Guangzhou, two quite developed cities in China as two case studies, we demonstrate the easy implementation and practicability of our method in delineating CBD. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据