4.7 Article

Sulfiredoxin-1 enhances cardiac progenitor cell survival against oxidative stress via the upregulation of the ERK/NRF2 signal pathway

期刊

FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
卷 123, 期 -, 页码 8-19

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2018.05.060

关键词

Sulfiredoxin-1; Human ALDH(br) cardiac stem/progenitor cells; Cell survival; Oxidative stress; ERK/NRF2 signaling pathway

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01HL114951]
  2. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [R01HL114951] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cardiac stem/progenitor cells (CPCs) have recently emerged as a potentially transformative regenerative medicine to repair the infarcted heart. However, the limited survival of donor cells is one of the major challenges for CPC therapy. Our recent research effort on preconditioning human CPCs (hCPCs) with cobalt protoporphyrin (CoPP) indicated that sulfiredoxin-1 (SRXN1) is upregulated upon preconditioning aldehyde dehydrogenase bright hCPCs (ALDH(br)-hCPCs) with CoPP. Further studies demonstrated that overexpressing SRXN1 enhanced the survival capacity for ALDH(br)-hCPCs. This was associated with the up-regulation of anti-apoptotic factors, including BCL2 and BCL xL. Meanwhile, overexpressing SRXN1 decreased the ROS generation and mitochondrial membrane potential, concomitant with the up-regulated primary antioxidant systems, such as PRDX1, PRDX3, TXNRD1, Catalase and SOD2. It was also observed that overexpressing SRXN1 increased the migration, proliferation, and cardiac differentiation of ALDH(br)-hCPCs. Interestingly, SRXN1 activated the ERK/NRF2 cell survival signaling pathway, which may be the underlying mechanism through which overexpressing SRXN1 lead to protection of hCPCs against oxidative stress-induced apoptosis. Taken together, these results provide a rationale for the exploration of SRXN1 as a novel molecular target that can be used to enhance the effectiveness of cardiac stem/progenitor cell therapy for ischemic heart disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据