4.7 Article

Increased TFAM binding to mtDNA damage hot spots is associated with mtDNA loss in aged rat heart

期刊

FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
卷 124, 期 -, 页码 447-453

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2018.06.041

关键词

Aging; Rat heart; MtDNA; Damage hot spots; TFAM binding

资金

  1. University of Bari-Progetti di Ateneo
  2. Istituto Banco di Napoli-Fondazione
  3. Fondazione Roma, nonprofit research foundation Achille and Linda Lorenzon
  4. National Institute on Aging (NIA) [R01 AG17994]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The well-known age-related mitochondrial dysfunction deeply affects heart because of the tissue's large dependence on mitochondrial ATP provision. Our study revealed in aged rat heart a significant 25% decrease in mtDNA relative content, a significant 29% increase in the 4.8 Kb mtDNA deletion relative content, and a significant inverse correlation between such contents as well as a significant 38% decrease in TFAM protein amount. The TFAM-binding activity to specific mtDNA regions increased at those encompassing the mtDNA replication origins, D-loop and Ori-L. The same mtDNA regions were screened for different kinds of oxidative damage, namely Single Strand Breaks (SSBs), Double Strand Breaks (DSBs), abasic sites (AP sites) and oxidized bases as 7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine (8oxoG). A marked increase in the relative content of mtDNA strand damage (SSBs, DSBs and AP sites) was found in the D-loop and Ori-L regions in the aged animals, unveiling for the first time in vivo an age-related, non-stochastic accumulation of oxidative lesions in these two regions that appear as hot spots of mtDNA damage. The use of Formamidopyrimidine glycosylase (Fpg) demonstrated also a significant age-related accumulation of oxidized purines particularly in the D-loop and Ori-L regions. The detected increased binding of TFAM to the mtDNA damage hot spots in aged heart suggests a link between TFAM binding to mtDNA and loss of mitochondrial genome likely through hindrance of repair processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据