4.2 Article

Rapid-Response Impulsivity: Definitions, Measurement Issues, and Clinical Implications

期刊

出版社

EDUCATIONAL PUBLISHING FOUNDATION-AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/per0000100

关键词

impulsivity; response; behavioral control; personality; assessment

资金

  1. Boehringer Ingelheim
  2. Lundbeck
  3. Ironwood
  4. Shire
  5. INSYS
  6. National Institutes of Health
  7. Veteran's Administration
  8. Mohegan Sun Casino
  9. National Center for Responsible Gaming
  10. Pfizer
  11. National Institutes of Health [P20 DA027844, P50 DA09241, RL1 AA017539, R01 DA018647]
  12. International Society for Research on Impulsivity
  13. Connecticut State Department of Mental Health and Addictions Services
  14. Connecticut Mental Health Center
  15. Yale Gambling Center of Research Excellence Award Grant from the National Center for Responsible Gaming

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Impulsivity is a multifaceted construct that is a core feature of multiple psychiatric conditions and personality disorders. However, progress in understanding and treating impulsivity is limited by a lack of precision and consistency in its definition and assessment. Rapid-response impulsivity (RRI) represents a tendency toward immediate action that occurs with diminished forethought and is out of context with the present demands of the environment. Experts from the International Society for Research on Impulsivity (InSRI) met to discuss and evaluate RRI measures in terms of reliability, sensitivity, and validity, with the goal of helping researchers and clinicians make informed decisions about the use and interpretation of findings from RRI measures. Their recommendations are described in this article. Commonly used clinical and preclinical RRI tasks are described, and considerations are provided to guide task selection. Tasks measuring two conceptually and neurobiologically distinct types of RRI, refraining from action initiation (RAI) and stopping an ongoing action (SOA) are described. RAI and SOA tasks capture distinct aspects of RRI that may relate to distinct clinical outcomes. The InSRI group recommends that (a) selection of RRI measures should be informed by careful consideration of the strengths, limitations, and practical considerations of the available measures; (b) researchers use both RAI and SOA tasks in RRI studies to allow for direct comparison of RRI types and examination of their associations with clinically relevant measures; and (c) similar considerations be made for human and nonhuman studies in an effort to harmonize and integrate preclinical and clinical research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据