4.2 Article

The kinetics of thermal degradation of polyphenolic compounds from elderberry (Sambucus nigra L.) extract

期刊

FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
卷 24, 期 4, 页码 361-369

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1082013218756139

关键词

Elderberry; polyphenols; thermal treatment; fluorescence; degradation kinetics

资金

  1. Romanian National Authority for Scientific Research and Innovation, CNCS-UEFISCDI [PN-II-RU-TE-2014-4-0115]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This main focus of this study was to evaluate the thermal degradation kinetics and the phytochemical characterization of the elderberries extract. Pelargonidin-3-sophoroside and delphinidin-3-glucoside were identified as the major anthocyanin compounds and catechin hydrate as the major flavonoid compound. In order to further understand the action of the heat treatment on the bioactive compounds from elderberry extract, fluorescence studies were also carried out. In general, heating at temperatures ranging from 100 to 150 degrees C for up to 90 min caused a decrease in fluorescence intensity, simultaneously with significant redshifts in lambda(max) suggesting important molecular changes inside the anthocyanins structure, affecting the antioxidant activity. Increasing the heating time up to 120 min, the elderberry extract peaked at about 88 nm shifted toward higher wavelengths with respect to that of untreated solutions (peak at 442 nm). The kinetics studies of anthocyanins, fluorescence intensity, and antioxidant activity evidenced a decrease of the degradation rate constants with increased temperature while the activation energies for heat-induced fluorescence intensity, monomeric anthocyanins, and antioxidant activity were 39.62 +/- 9.60, 49.97 +/- 5.61, and 31.04 +/- 19.92 kJ/mol, respectively. Our results can be valuable in terms of establishing the appropriate processing and formulation protocols that could lead to a more efficient utilization of these pigments in actual food products and/or nutraceuticals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据