4.7 Article

Methyl jasmonate and ozone affect the antioxidant system and the quality of wine grape during postharvest partial dehydration

期刊

FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
卷 112, 期 -, 页码 369-377

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.06.061

关键词

Grape; Postharvest; Dehydration; Methyl jasmonate; Ozone; Antioxidant enzymes

资金

  1. ARSIAL (Lazio Region Administration) [. 0005943/2017]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Postharvest partial dehydration is a technique used in the production of important dry and sweet wines in Italy. An accurate management of the dehydration environmental parameters allows for the modulation of berry metabolism and the maintenance/improvement of the enochemical quality of grapes. As it is known that water loss induces oxidative processes in berries, our hypothesis was that methyl jasmonate (MeJA) and ozone (03), as postharvest treatments before partial dehydration, might be beneficial for grape berry quality. Grape bunches were postharvest treated with 10 or 100 mu M MeJA at 20 degrees C or with ozone gas at 10 degrees C, in 70% relative humidity (RI-I) and air flow, for 12 h; the control bunches were untreated and kept at 20 degrees C for 12 h. Subsequently, partial dehydration was performed at 10 degrees C until a 30% weight loss (w.l.) was reached. MeJA hastened grape berry water loss. Polyphenol and flavonoid contents at the end of the partial dehydration were lower in the MeJA-treated berries than in the control and ozone samples. Superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), and guaiacol peroxidase (GPX) activity rates increased in the treated samples. In contrast, lipoxygenase (LOX) and polyphenoloxidase (PPO) had lower activities in the MeJA-treated samples than in the controls. It would seem that MeJA accelerates grape water loss but at the same time activates the antioxidant system. Ozone does not accelerate grape water loss but induces the antioxidant system and increases polyphenol content.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据