4.7 Article

Effect of dietary polyphenols on the in vitro starch digestibility of pigmented maize varieties under cooking conditions

期刊

FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
卷 108, 期 -, 页码 183-191

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.03.049

关键词

Pigmented maize flours; Metabolomics; Polyphenols; In vitro starch digestion; Resistant starch

资金

  1. Doctoral School on the Agro-Food System (AgriSystem) of the Universita Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (UCSC, Piacenza, Italy)
  2. Enrica e Romeo Invernizzi Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Interest in using polyphenols as modulators of the activity of starch digestive enzymes is increasing. The main purpose of this study was to investigate the role of phenolic compounds characterising pigmented maize flours in the modulation of in vitro starch digestibility. Flours from three different pigmented maize varieties were evaluated under cooking conditions and compared to common yellow maize (YM). The untargeted metabolomics-based approach comprehensively annotated around 300 phenolic compounds, with a high distribution of anthocyanins and phenolic acids (in free and bound fractions of maize samples) and significant differences across genotypes. Following in vitro starch digestion, the cooked pigmented maize flours showed higher resistant starch content (from 5.1 to 6.9 g/100 g dry matter), as well as lower starch hydrolysis index (HI) when compared to YM flour, with the Rostrato Rosso maize having the lowest HI (ie., 61). Coherently, multivariate statistics following metabolomics showed the discrimination potential of anthocyanins' profile after cooking, characterising the Rostrato Rosso during in vitro digestion. These findings might be related to the modulation of enzyme activity by phenolic compounds during in vitro digestion. Therefore, the use of pigmented maize flours might help in the formulation of gluten-free foods with slowly digestible starches by exploiting the wide phenolic composition of these matrices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据