4.7 Article

Application of Illumina-MiSeq high throughput sequencing and culture-dependent techniques for the identification of microbiota of silver carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix) treated by tea polyphenols

期刊

FOOD MICROBIOLOGY
卷 76, 期 -, 页码 52-61

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2018.04.010

关键词

Silver carp; Tea polyphenols; Microbiota; Shelf life extension

资金

  1. earmarked fund for China Agriculture Research System [CARS-45]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31471683]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the antimicrobial effects of tea polyphenols (TP) on changes in microbiota composition and quality attributes in silver carp fillets stored at 4 degrees C. During storage, TP treatment was found to be effective in enhancing sensory quality, inhibiting microbial growth, and attenuating chemical quality deterioration. Meanwhile, the composition of microbiota of silver carp fillets was investigated using culture-dependent and culture-independent methods. Initially, compared to the control, TP obviously decreased the relative abundance of Aeromonas, which allowed Acinetobacter and Methylobacterium to become the dominant microbiota in TP treated fillets on day 0. The controls, 0.5% TP-treated fillets, and 1% TP-treated fillets were rejected by sensory panelists on days 8, 12, and 12, respectively. At the time of sensory rejection, Aeromonas, followed by Acinetobacter and Pseudomonas, became the main spoilers in the control on day 8. However, TP treatment inhibited the growth of Aeromonas and Acinetobacter significantly. Consequently, Aeromonas followed by Pseudomonas and Shewanella became the predominant microbiota in all TP-treated fillets on day 12. Therefore, TP improved the quality of fillets during chilled storage, which was mainly due to their modulating effects on microbiota that resulted in the change in pattern and process of spoilage in fillets. (c) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据