4.7 Article

Functional, nutritional and flavor characteristic of soybean proteins obtained through reverse micelles

期刊

FOOD HYDROCOLLOIDS
卷 74, 期 -, 页码 358-366

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2017.08.024

关键词

Soybean protein; Reverse micelles; Functionality; Nutrition; Flavor

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21406133]
  2. National Key Technology Support Program [2015BAD29B04]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The functional, nutritional and flavor characteristics of soybean proteins obtained through reverse micelles (RMs) were investigated, and compared with proteins separated by alkaline extraction and isoelectric precipitation (AEIP). The results showed that nitrogen solubility index, oil absorption capacity, foaming capacity, foaming stability, emulsifying capacity and emulsifying stability were found to be higher in the soybean proteins obtained through RMs (those values were 96.9%, 2.57 g/g, 131.65%, 84.33%, 81.71% and 82.26%, respectively) than in proteins obtained through AEIP (those values were 88.8%, 2.06 g/g, 112.32%, 57.15%, 50.94% and 51.22%, respectively), while water holding capacity decreased by 8.82%. Some individual amino acid contents in two proteins were different, some were similar, but the total amino acid content, EAA, AAS and BV(82.50%, 27.91, 115 and 92.67, respectively) of proteins using RMs were higher than those (79.31%, 26.36, 108 and 85.86, respectively). The flavor compounds in two type proteins were analyzed by GCeMS. A total of 15 different flavor compounds in the soybean proteins obtained through RMs were identified, while 22 different flavor compounds were identified in soybean proteins obtained through AEIP. The total flavor compounds in soybean proteins obtained through RMs was higher than that of AEIP, the percent ratio of hexanal to total volatiles recovery was lower. These results indicated that reverse micelles could improve the functional, nutritional and flavor properties of soybean proteins. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据