4.7 Article

Fundamental study on the improvement of the antifungal activity of Lactobacillus reuteri R29 through increased production of phenyllactic acid and reuterin

期刊

FOOD CONTROL
卷 88, 期 -, 页码 139-148

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2017.11.041

关键词

Lactobacillus reuteri R29; Phenyllactic acid; Reuterin; Antifungal; Bread making

资金

  1. Irish Government under the National Development Plan through the research program FIRM/RSF/CoFoRD
  2. Irish Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lactic acid bacteria have shown great potential as bio-preservative agents to maintain high food quality and safety. The strain Lactobacillus reuteri R29 is reported to have a broad spectrum of antifungal activity and suitability for application in food systems. Its antifungal activity is predominantly based on phenyllactic acid (PLA). Furthermore, it is potentially a producer of reuterin, a potent antimicrobial agent. This study focused on increasing the antifungal activity in vitro by supplementation of the growth medium with phenylalanine and glycerol to increase the yield of PLA and reuterin, respectively. For PLA, the addition of 1.5% phenylalanine (w/v) to MRS, resulted in significantly increased accumulation of PIA and antifungal performance against Fusarium culmorum. Supplementation of MRS with 500mM glycerol combined with a reduced glucose content (1.5%) showed the highest reuterin accumulation combined with fungal inhibition. To investigate the antifungal performance in situ, these cell-free supernatants (cfs) were applied in a bread system. The application of PLA-enriched cfs resulted in significantly extended (4 days) microbial shelf life compared to the control. The reuterin-enriched medium did not lead to significant shelf life extension. In conclusion, Lactobacillus reuteri R29 and its PIA-enriched cfs were found to be very promising alternatives for food bio-preservation. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据