4.1 Article

The effect of long-term administered CRAC channels blocker on the functions of respiratory epithelium in guinea pig allergic asthma model

期刊

GENERAL PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOPHYSICS
卷 34, 期 2, 页码 167-176

出版社

GENERAL PHYSIOL AND BIOPHYSICS
DOI: 10.4149/gpb_2014031

关键词

CRAC channels; Cytokines; Ovalbumine; Airway hyperreactivity; c-Fos

资金

  1. project Centre of Experimental and Clinical Respirology I
  2. project Centre of Experimental and Clinical Respirology II
  3. project BioMed
  4. EC
  5. VEGA [1/0020/11, 1/0127/13, 1/0165/14]
  6. MZ [2012/35-UKMA-12]
  7. APVV [0305-12]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Previously, therapeutic potency of CRAC channels blocker was evidenced as a significant decrease in airway smooth muscle hyperreactivity, antitussive and anti-inflammatory effects. The major role of the respiratory epithelium in asthma pathogenesis was highlighted only recently and CRAC channels were proposed as the most significant route of Ca2+ entry into epithelial cells. The aim of the study was to analyse the impact of long-term administered CRAC channels blocker on airway epithelium, e.g. cytokine production and ciliary beat frequency (CBF) using an animal model of allergic asthma. Ovalbumin-induced allergic airway inflammation of guinea pigs was followed by long-term (14 days lasted) therapy by CRAC blocker (3-fluoropyridine-4-carboxylic acid, FPCA). The influence of long-term therapy on cytokines (IL-4, IL-5 and IL-13) in BALF and in plasma, immunohistochemical staining of pulmonary tissue (c-Fos positivity) and CBF in vitro were used for analysis. Decrease in cytokine levels and in c-Fos positivity confirmed an anti-inflammatory effect of long-term administered FPCA. Cytokine levels in BALF and distribution of c-Fos positivity suggested that FPCA was a more potent inhibitor of respiratory epithelium secretory functions than budesonide. FPCA and budesonide reduced CBF only insignificantly. All findings supported CRAC channels as promising target in the new strategy of antiasthmatic treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据