4.7 Article

Hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography coupled with quadrupole-orbitrap ultra high resolution mass spectrometry to quantitate nucleobases, nucleosides, and nucleotides during white tea withering process

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 266, 期 -, 页码 343-349

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.06.030

关键词

HILIC-Quadrupole-Orbitrap-UHRMS; Nucleotides; Nucleosides; Nucleobases; White tea; Withering process

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31270735]
  2. Collaborative Innovation Center of Chinese Oolong tea Industry [2013-51]
  3. Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University
  4. special fund for Science and Technology innovation from Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University [CXZX2016117CXZX2017313]
  5. Faculty Postdoctoral Fellowship from Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nucleotides, nucleosides, and nucleobases are important bioactive compounds. Recent studies suggested that they possess taste activity. However, it remains unknown about their presence in white tea and how they change during white tea manufacture. Here, we first established method based on hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography coupled with quadrupole-orbitrap ultra high resolution mass spectrometry (HILIC-Quadrupole-Orbitrap-UHRMS) platform, then applied it to study the dynamic changes of nucleotides, nucleosides, and nucleobases during white tea withering process. Five compounds, including adenosine 5'-monophosphate monohydrate (AMP), guanosine 5'-monophosphate disodium salt hydrate (GMP), adenosine, cytidine, thymine and uracil, were detected from withering samples. They showed a general decline trend during white tea withering process, however, considerable amount of them was retained after withering for 48 h except adenosine which was below detection limit after withering for 21 h. This study provided a complete picture about nucleotides, nucleosides and nucleobases changes during white tea withering process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据