4.7 Article

Molecular mechanism of anti-cancerous potential of Morin extracted from mulberry in Hela cells

期刊

FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY
卷 112, 期 -, 页码 466-475

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2017.07.002

关键词

Morin; Mulberry; Cervical cancer; Apoptosis; Cell cycle; Molecular mechanism

资金

  1. Major Projects of Science and Technology in Anhui Province [15czz03115]
  2. Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest of China [201403064]
  3. Key projects of Natural Science Research of Anhui Province [KJ2016A575]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The flavonoids are of great interest due to their antioxidant and anti-cancerous potential. The present study investigated the Morin extracted from mulberry leaves and its anti-cancerous mechanism via cell inhibition, cell cycle analysis, apoptosis, mRNA expression and antioxidant mechanism through reactive oxygen species generation. Morin inhibited the proliferation of HeLa cells at IC50 of 214.28 mu M and led to morphological changes, followed by induction of cell cycle arrest in G2/M-phase and ultimately resulted into apoptosis. Morin-induced G2/M-phase arrest was accompanied by the increase in mRNA expression of p53, p21 and Wee 1 genes and decreased levels of CDK1, Cdc25c, Survivin, cyclin B1 and CHK2. Morin induced apoptosis was regulated through multiple pathways, including intrinsic and extrinsic pathway. The underlying mechanisms consisted of increased mRNA expression of Bax, Bad, cytochrome c, Apaf-1, caspases-9, DR3, DR5, FasL, FADD, caspases-10, PARP, PI3K, AKT, mTOR, P7056K and Smac genes as well as decreased expression of Bcl-2, Bcl-xL, AMPK, cIAP-1, cIAP-2, PKC epsilon and NF-K beta. In addition, Morin treatment resulted in the generation of intracellular ROS, which play an essential role in the induction of apoptosis. The present study recommends the use of Morin in the development of functional foods with anti-cancerous potential in the future. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据