4.5 Article

Advancements in hydrate phase equilibria and modeling of gas hydrates systems

期刊

FLUID PHASE EQUILIBRIA
卷 463, 期 -, 页码 48-61

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.fluid.2018.01.014

关键词

Clathrate hydrates; Thermodynamic inhibitors; Phase equilibria

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reliable hydrate phase behavior predictions are critical to petroleum and natural gas processing and design, and operation of process equipment. Inaccurate predictions of phase equilibria can also lead to erroneous design of process facilities and subsequently may cause safety hazards and flow assurance issues. This work reviews the experimental data on hydrate phase equilibria in the presence of inhibitors (Salts + Organic Inhibitors). The statistical thermodynamic model of van der Waals and Platteeuw for hydrate phase equilibria prediction is also critically reviewed. Recent studies have shown that the basic assumptions of the van der Waals and Platteeuw model, including the spherical symmetry of molecules, no guest guest interactions, and no lattice distortions (due to guest molecules) can introduce errors in the predicted results. In addition, the limitations of the fluid phase models, which do not account for the effect of hydrogen bonding and electrolyte contributions, can lead to severe prediction errors in hydrate forming systems containing polar hydrate formers, inhibitors, and salts, especially at high concentrations. Thermodynamic predictions of gas hydrate phase equilibria for polar hydrate formers and inhibited systems (e.g., NaCI, KG. CaCl2, and also methanol, ethanol, Ethane-1,2-diol) are of major concern because of the large errors in fluid phase equilibrium predictions. The unavailability of phase equilibria data, an appropriate electrolyte model, and an associative equation of state as well leads to various problems in predicting the properties of aqueous associating fluids and inhibited systems. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据