4.5 Article

Liquid-liquid extraction of lithium from aqueous solution using novel ionic liquid extractants via COSMO-RS and experiments

期刊

FLUID PHASE EQUILIBRIA
卷 459, 期 -, 页码 129-137

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.fluid.2017.11.038

关键词

Liquid-liquid extraction; Ionic liquid; Lithium; COSMO-RS

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21506042]
  2. International S&T Cooperation Program of China [2016YFE0102400]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Public Welfare Scientific Institution [K-JBYWF-2015-T06]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ionic liquids (ILs) have been proposed as promising extractants to broaden the potential utility of liquid liquid extraction process for lithium, but developing an attractive IL from numerous available ILs remains challenging. In this work, a rapid preliminary predicting and screening method based on COSMO-RS was proposed. The design strategy was to collocate anions that had intensive affinity to lithium ion with high hydrophobic cations. Based on it, a series of candidate ILs were prepared and characterized by H-1 and C-13 NMR spectroscopy, including [P-4444]-based and [N-4444]-based ILs with phosphate, phosphinate and long-chain carboxylate anions. The further extraction experiments indicated that the tetrabutylammonium mono-2-ethylhexyl(2-ethylhexyl)phosphate ([N-44444][EHPMEH]) had the highest Li+ extraction efficiency. The extraction mechanism was investigated by slope analysis method and ATR-IR spectroscopy. It was determined that every Li+ associated with 1.33 molecule [N-4444][EHPMEH] to form the extracted species. The stripping study showed that the Li+ was able to be stripped by only 0.5 mol/L HCl Without additional agents. The extraction experiments of Li+ from multi-metal-ion solution were also carried out, and the distribution ratio of Li+ was nearly twice those of Na+, K+, and Rb+, indicating that [N-4444][EHPMEH] was available to separate lithium ion from the other alkali metal ions. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据