4.5 Article

Experimental measurement and thermodynamic modeling of equilibrium condition for natural gas hydrate in MEG aqueous solution

期刊

FLUID PHASE EQUILIBRIA
卷 459, 期 -, 页码 110-118

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.fluid.2017.11.034

关键词

Hydrate equilibrium condition; Synthetic natural gas; Mono ethylene glycol; Stepwise heating method; Clathrate hydrate

资金

  1. South Pars Gas Complex (SPGC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Comprehensive information about the hydrate formation and dissociation conditions is necessary for design and operation of different processes in the petroleum industry. This study investigated the natural gas hydrate equilibrium conditions in the presence of mono ethylene glycol aqueous solution as a widely used thermodynamic hydrate inhibitor in the oil and gas industries. Stepwise heating Method was used for the hydrate formation and dissociation tests in a 250 cm(3) stainless steel equilibrium cell. To validate and verify the performance of the apparatus and the method used, methane hydrate equilibrium data were measured and compared to a number of selected experimental data in the literature. This verification showed that the experimental procedure was accurate. The equilibrium temperatures of synthetic natural gas (SNG) hydrates in the absence of MEG aqueous solutions at various pressures of 3.95, 4.49, 536, 6.50, 6.85, and 8.20 MPa were 289.9, 290.9, 291.7, 293.1, 293.5 and 294.5 K, respectively. The equilibrium data for natural gas hydrate in the presence of 0.10 and 0.20 mass fractions of MEG in the water for pressure range of 3.90-8.20 MPa were also comparatively measured. The results showed that the natural gas hydrate equilibrium temperature decreased about 2.5 and 5 K in the presence of 0.10 and 0.20 mass fractions of MEG, respectively. The modified statistical thermodynamic model based on van der Waals and Platteeuw solid solution theory and the PVTsim software were applied to predict and evaluate hydrate equilibrium conditions. Thermodynamic model predictions matched reasonably well with the experimental results. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据