4.7 Article

HOT JUPITERS FROM COPLANAR HIGH-ECCENTRICITY MIGRATION

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 805, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/805/1/75

关键词

planetary systems; planets and satellites: dynamical evolution and stability; planets and satellites: formation

资金

  1. CONICYT Bicentennial Becas Chile fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We study the possibility that hot Jupiters (HJs) are formed through the secular gravitational interactions between two planets in eccentric orbits with relatively low mutual inclinations (less than or similar to 20 degrees) and friction due to tides raised on the planet by the host star. We term this migration mechanism Coplanar High-eccentricity Migration (CHEM) because, like disk migration, it allows for migration to occur on the same plane in which the planets formed. CHEM can operate from the following typical initial configurations: (i) the. inner planet in a circular orbit and the outer planet with an eccentricity greater than or similar to 0.67 for m(in)/m(out)(a(in)/a(out))(1/2) less than or similar to 0.3 1 2; (ii) two eccentric (greater than or similar to 0.5) orbits for m(in)/m(out) (a(in)/a(out))(1/2) less than or similar to 0.16. A population synthesis study of hierarchical systems of two giant planets using the observed eccentricity distribution of giant planets shows that CHEM produces HJs with low stellar obliquities (less than or similar to 30 degrees), with a semi-major axis distribution that matches the observations, and at a rate that can account for their observed occurrence. A different mechanism is needed to create large obliquity HJs, either a different migration channel or a mechanism that tilts the star or the protoplanetary disk. CHEM predicts that HJs should have distant (a greater than or similar to 5 AU) and massive (most likely similar to 1-3 times. more massive than the HJ) companions with relatively low mutual inclinations (less than or similar to 20 degrees) and moderately high eccentricities (e similar to 0.2-0.5).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据