4.7 Article

Basal polarization of the immune responses to Streptococcus agalactiae susceptible and resistant tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)

期刊

FISH & SHELLFISH IMMUNOLOGY
卷 75, 期 -, 页码 336-345

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsi.2018.01.022

关键词

Tilapia; RNA-Seq; Spleen; Disease resistance; Streptococcus agalactiae

资金

  1. Guangxi Major Projects for Science and Technology [AA17204080-2]
  2. Guangxi Key Research and Development Program [AB16380077]
  3. Guangxi Open Project Fund of Key Laboratory of Aquatic Genetic Breeding and Health Aquaculture [GXKL-AQUA-2015-b-02]
  4. Guangxi Science and Technology Research Program [14121004-1-1]
  5. Guangxi 'Bagui Scholar' project

向作者/读者索取更多资源

One of the highest priority areas for improvement is the development of effective strategies for decreasing disease mortality levels in aquaculture production, a better understanding of the components of the fish immune system and their functions in the context of pathogen invasion is needed. Tilapia is the most common fish in South China, and Streptococcus agalactiae has become the most serious disease problem for tilapia industry in China. Here, we profiled gene expression differences between tilapia differing in their susceptibility to S. agalactiae both basally (before infection) and at three early timepoints post-infection (5 h, 50 h, and 7 d). Between group comparisons revealed 5756 unique genes differentially expressed greater than 2-fold at one or more timepoints. And the resistant fish showed much more strong ability in pathogen recognition, antigen presentation, immune activation, while the susceptible fish showed fast activation of apoptosis. Taken together, the immune profiles expand our knowledge for molecular mechanisms for disease resistance, as well as provide solid molecular resources for further identification of the candidate markers for disease-resistant selection and evaluation of disease prevention and treatment options for tilapia industry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据