4.7 Article

Use of the beta growth function to quantitatively characterize the effects of plant density and a growth regulator on growth and biomass partitioning in cotton

期刊

FIELD CROPS RESEARCH
卷 224, 期 -, 页码 28-36

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2018.04.017

关键词

Biomass partitioning; Beta growth function; Growth rate; Mepiquat chloride; Plant population density

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31601253]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2016CQ20]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M610438]
  4. Modern Agro-industry Technology Research System of Shandong Province [SDAIT-03]
  5. '948' Program [2011-G19]
  6. Program of the Modern Agricultural Industry Technology System [CARS-18-18]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Allocation of newly formed biomass towards plant organs is a key determinant of plant performance that is affected by agronomic practices such as plant population density and use of growth regulators. Here we quantified biomass allocation of intercropped cotton (Gossypittin hirsutum) growing at two population densities (3.0 and 7.5 plants m(-2)) and with or without application of the growth regulator mepiquat chloride (MC) in three consecutive years. The beta growth function was used to quantitatively characterize the dynamics of biomass partitioning. Compared to low density, high density increased daily growth rate and final above-ground dry matter, but decreased allocation to fruits. Application of MC did not affect dry matter accumulation but increased allocation to fruits by 22%. The parameters of the beta growth function have a clear biological interpretation, providing a useful quantitative characterization of the effect of management on dry matter allocation in cotton. The function may also be used to model organ-specific daily assimilate partitioning as a component in models of plant growth and crop production with the consideration of discussed caveats.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据