4.7 Article

Multicenter evaluation of the Access AMH antimullerian hormone assay for the prediction of antral follicle count and poor ovarian response to controlled ovarian stimulation

期刊

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
卷 110, 期 3, 页码 506-+

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.03.031

关键词

Antimullerian hormone; ovarian response; antral follicle count

资金

  1. Beckman Coulter

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To evaluate a new fully automated antimullerian hormone (AMH) assay for prediction of poor ovarian response (POR) to ovarian stimulation defined as four or fewer oocytes retrieved. Design: Prospective cohort study. Setting: Thirteen private and academic fertility centers in the United Slates. Patients(s): A total of 178 women undergoing their first in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle eligible for the study were consented and enrolled, with data available from 160 women for prediction of POR and 164 women for AMH correlation with antral follicle count (AFC). Intervention(s): None. Main Outcome Measure(s): Cutoff point for AMH that predicts POR. Correlation of AMH with AFC, and cutoff point for AMH that correlates with antral follicle count >15. Result(s): The mean AMH among the poor responders was 0.74 ng/mL, compared with 3.20 ng/mL for normal to high responders. The AMH cutoff at 90% specificity for predicting POR with the use of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.93 ng/mL, with an associated sensitivity of 74.1%. For prediction of POR, ROC analysis showed that AMH (area under the ROC curve [AUC] = 0.929) was significantly better than FSH (AUC - 0.615; P< .0001). AMH was positively correlated with AFC (Spearman rho = 0.756). The AMH at 90% sensitivity for AFC >15 was 1.75, with specificity of 59.1%. Conclusion(s): A fully automated AMH assay can be a useful biomarker for predicting POR in IVF cycles. Because AMH cutoff points vary depending on the assay used, future studies should continue to calibrate test results to clinically important outcomes. (C) 2018 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据