4.7 Article

Ginsenoside Rh2 inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor-induced corneal neovascularization

期刊

FASEB JOURNAL
卷 32, 期 7, 页码 3782-3791

出版社

FEDERATION AMER SOC EXP BIOL
DOI: 10.1096/fj.201701074RR

关键词

VEGF; Gab1; inflammation; traditional Chinese medicine

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81302195, 31371139, 81571282, 81771457, 81700859, 81371055, 81570859, 81670878]
  2. Medical Science and Technology Development Project Fund of Nanjing [YKK16271, YKK15241, YKK16270]
  3. Jiangsu Province Six-Talent Peaks
  4. Natural Science Foundation [BK2016022104, BK20170060, BK20171065]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

VEGF-induced neovascularization plays a pivotal role in corneal neovascularization (CoNV). The current study investigated the potential effect of ginsenoside Rh2 (GRh2) on neovascularization. In HUVECs, pretreatment with GRh2 largely attenuated VEGF-induced cell proliferation, migration, and vessel-like tube formation in vitro. At the molecular level, GRh2 disrupted VEGF-induced VEGF receptor 2 (VEGFR2)-Grb-2-associated binder 1 (Gab1) association in HUVECs, causing inactivation of downstream AKT and ERK signaling. Gab1 knockdown (by targeted short hairpin RNA) similarly inhibited HUVEC proliferation and migration. Notably, GRh2 was ineffective against VEGF in Gab1-silenced HUVECs. In a mouse cornea alkali burn model, GRh2 eyedrops inhibited alkali-induced neovascularization and inflammatory cell infiltrations in the cornea. Furthermore, alkali-induced corneal expression of mRNAs/long noncoding RNAs in cornea were largely attenuated by GRh2. Overall, GRh2 inhibits VEGF-induced angiogenic effect via inhibiting VEGFR2-Gab1 signaling in vitro. It also alleviates angiogenic and inflammatory responses in alkali burn-treated mouse corneas.Zhang, X.-P., Li, K.-R., Yu, Q., Yao, M.-D., Ge, H.-M., Li, X.-M., Jiang, Q., Yao, J., Cao, C. Ginsenoside Rh2 inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor-induced corneal neovascularization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据