4.7 Article

Bisphenol A promotes hyperuricemia via activating xanthine oxidase

期刊

FASEB JOURNAL
卷 32, 期 2, 页码 1007-1016

出版社

FEDERATION AMER SOC EXP BIOL
DOI: 10.1096/fj.201700755R

关键词

uric acid; synthesis; direct binding; enzyme; liver

资金

  1. National Key Clinical Specialties Construction Program of China
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81370954, 81670785]
  3. Fundamental Science and Advanced Technology Research of Chongqing Major Project [cstc2015jcyjBX0096]
  4. Chongqing Science and Technology Committee Innovation Project, Technology Development and Application of Precision Medicine [cstc2016shms-ztzx1003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The prevalence of hyperuricemia has increased rapidly over the past decades. Bisphenol A (BPA) is an environmental endocrine disruptor. We investigated the effects of BPA on uric acid metabolism and its potential mechanisms. Experiments were performed in different animal models, cell cultures, and humans. In 3 different animal models, BPA exposure increased serum and hepatic uric acid with enhanced activity of xanthine oxidase (XO) in liver, whereas the excretion of uric acid was unchanged. Both in vivo and in vitro, BPA-induced uric acid production was decreased after treatment with allopurinol, which is a XO inhibitor. XO led to the accumulation of uric acid after xanthine was added, with the enzyme-catalyzed reaction, which was enhanced by BPA. Altered secondary structures of XO were found by circular dichroism analysis in the conditions of different BPA concentrations. Molecular docking portrayed Asp360 and Lys422 of XO to be the preferred binding sites for BPA. Mutation of both sites significantly blocked the effect of BPA on XO activity. In humans, patients with hyperuricemia exhibited higher levels of serum BPA than subjects without hyperuricemia. These findings demonstrate BPA promotes hyperuricemia by increasing hepatic uric acid synthesis via the activation of XO, probably through direct binding.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据