4.5 Article

Adolescent RSA Responses During an Anger Discussion Task: Relations to Emotion Regulation and Adjustment

期刊

EMOTION
卷 15, 期 3, 页码 360-372

出版社

AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/emo0000040

关键词

respiratory sinus arrhythmia; RSA time course; emotion regulation; prosocial behavior; aggressive behavior

资金

  1. United States Department of Agriculture, Oklahoma Agriculture Experiment Station [AB-1-13921]
  2. Oklahoma Center for the Advancement of Science and Technology (OCAST) [AA-5-40772, AA-5-45433, HR11-130]
  3. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [AA-5-43382, 1R15HD072463-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The current study examined associations between adolescent respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) during an angry event discussion task and adolescents' emotion regulation and adjustment. Data were collected from 206 adolescents (10-18 years of age, M age = 13.37). Electrocardiogram (ECG) and respiration data were collected from adolescents, and RSA values and respiration rates were computed. Adolescents reported on their own emotion regulation, prosocial behavior, and aggressive behavior. Multilevel latent growth modeling was employed to capture RSA responses across time (i.e., linear and quadratic changes; time course approach), and adolescent emotion regulation and adjustment variables were included in the model to test their links to RSA responses. Results indicated that high RSA baseline was associated with more adolescent prosocial behavior. A pattern of initial RSA decreases (RSA suppression) in response to angry event recall and subsequent RSA increases (RSA rebound) were related to better anger and sadness regulation and more prosocial behavior. However, RSA was not significantly linked to adolescent aggressive behavior. We also compared the time course approach with the conventional linear approach and found that the time course approach provided more meaningful and rich information. The implications of adaptive RSA change patterns are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据