4.7 Article

Performance improvement of Teaching-Learning-Based Optimisation for robust machine layout design

期刊

EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS
卷 98, 期 -, 页码 129-152

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2018.01.005

关键词

Computational intelligence; Teaching-Learning-Based Optimisation; Facility layout; Robust design; Dynamic demand

资金

  1. Thailand Research Fund [MRG6080031, RDG60T0003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Teaching-Learning-Based Optimisation (TLBO) is one of the more recently developed metaheuristics and has been successfully applied to solve various optimisation problems. However, TLBO has not been academically reported for solving the robust machine layout design (MLD) problems with dynamic demand. Considering internal logistics activities, shortening material flow distance within a manufacturing area can lead to efficient productivity and a decrease in related costs. The robust machine layout is concerned with determining the efficient arrangement of machines/facilities located on a manufacturing shop floor under future demand fluctuation. A robust designed layout is essential for a company to maintain a high productivity rate through multiple time-periods of demand uncertainty with minimum effects related to the re-layout time and cost, manufacturing disruption, and the movement of monument machines. The objectives of this paper were to: i) describe the development of a computer aided layout designing tool for minimising the total material flow distance under dynamic demand scenario, ii) investigate the appropriate setting of TLBO parameters, and iii) propose four TLBO modifications for improving its performance. The modified TLBOs were inspired by multiple teachers with two types of classes and two approaches to teacher selection. The numerical experiments were designed and conducted using eleven MLD bench marking datasets. Statistical analyses on the experimental results showed a superior performance for the proposed modifications. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据