4.5 Review

Use of whole genome sequencing in surveillance of drug resistant tuberculosis

期刊

EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTI-INFECTIVE THERAPY
卷 16, 期 5, 页码 433-442

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14787210.2018.1472577

关键词

Tuberculosis; surveillance; drug resistance; transmission; whole genome sequencing

资金

  1. Medical Research Council UK [MR/K000551/1, MR/M01360X/1, MR/N010469/1, MC_PC_15103]
  2. BBSRC UK [BB/R013063]
  3. BBSRC [BB/R013063/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. MRC [MC_PC_15103, MR/N010469/1, MR/M01360X/1, MR/K000551/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: The threat of resistance to anti-tuberculosis drugs is of global concern. Current efforts to monitor resistance rely on phenotypic testing where cultured bacteria are exposed to critical concentrations of the drugs. Capacity for such testing is low in TB endemic countries. Drug resistance is caused by mutations in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis genome and whole genome sequencing to detect these mutations offers an alternative means of assessing resistance.Areas covered: The challenges of assessing TB drug resistance are discussed. Progress in elucidating the M. tuberculosis resistome and evidence of the accuracy of next generation sequencing for detecting resistance is reviewed.Expert Commentary: There are considerable advantages to using next generation sequencing for TB drug resistance surveillance. Accuracy is high for detecting resistance to the major first-line drugs but is currently lower for the second-line drugs due to our incomplete knowledge regarding resistance causing mutations. With the advances in sequencing technology and the opportunity to replace phenotypic drug susceptibility testing with safer and more cost effective methods it would appear that the question is when to implement. Current bottlenecks are sample extraction to allow whole genome sequencing directly from sputum and the lack of bioinformatics expertise in some TB endemic countries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据