4.6 Article

Walking Speed and Step Length Asymmetry Modify the Energy Cost of Walking After Stroke

期刊

NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR
卷 29, 期 5, 页码 416-423

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1545968314552528

关键词

stroke; gait; symmetry; oxygen consumption

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01NR010786, T32HD007490, K01HD050582, U54GM104941, P30GM103333]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. A higher energy cost of walking poststroke has been linked to reduced walking performance and reduced participation in the community. Objective. To determine the contribution of postintervention improvements in walking speed and spatiotemporal gait asymmetry to the reduction in the energy cost of walking after stroke. Methods. In all, 42 individuals with chronic hemiparesis (>6 months poststroke) were recruited to participate in 12 weeks of walking rehabilitation. The energy cost of walking, walking speed, and step length, swing time, and stance time asymmetries were calculated pretraining and posttraining. Sequential regression analyses tested the cross-sectional (ie, pretraining) and longitudinal (ie, posttraining changes) relationships between the energy cost of walking versus speed and each measure of asymmetry. Results. Pretraining walking speed ( = -.506) and swing time asymmetry ( = .403) predicted pretraining energy costs: R-adj(2) = 0.713; F(3, 37) = 34.05; P < .001. In contrast, change in walking speed ( = .340) and change in step length asymmetry ( = .934) predicted change in energy costs with a significant interaction between these independent predictors: R-adj(2) = 0.699; F(4, 31) = 21.326; P < .001. Moderation by the direction or the magnitude of pretraining asymmetry was not found. Conclusions. For persons in the chronic phase of stroke recovery, faster and more symmetric walking after intervention appears to be more energetically advantageous than merely walking faster or more symmetrically. This finding has important functional implications, given the relationship between the energy cost of walking and community walking participation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据